I have a 60 Gallon Giant electric hot water heater. The bottom element has burnt out. I tried to replace it this past weekend, but ran into a snag when I tried to remove the old element. Basically, the element looks to be held into place by 4 large bolts (which are easily removable), but I ran into trouble when I tried to remove it because it won’t budge! It looks like a steel plate, with a plastic rectangular piece on the front of it where the hot wire connectors attach.
I thought that I could simply pull this piece out and the element would be attached to it, but it won’t move and I don’t want to apply too much pressure to it for fear of breaking it. The tank is only 3 years old, but of course, I can’t find the receipt for it so the warranty is no good
Does anyone have any experience with replacing these elements? Do I need a special tool to reef the old one out of there? The manual is of no help of course because it just says ‘remove element’…
Thanks in advance!

We bought a 25 year old house in May in MA. We had a general contractor do some work (roof, windows, siding, floors, kitchen cabinets). He got 2 permits for that work which he says are "closed".
In the process of converting our mortgage, the building dept just realized the original owners never completed all their inspections on their building permit (1985), and there is no occupancy permit for this house. They did do some (foundation / insulation / frame / plumbing).

Bldg dept found documents "in the back of the file". These show the original owners had gotten 3 letters telling them they were in violation of MA state law (1988, 90, 91). The dept must have forgotten about it, since with no occupancy permit our contractor shouldn’t have been able to get permits.

Since they say we are now in violation of MA state law, I paid the fee and we’ll get all the inspections.

Now I’m worried there will be costly code violations!
The general contractor (and others) have noticed things that were done ‘differently’. It looks like the owners might have really done alot of the work themselves. Knowing someone that had been an electrician, he’s pointed out some things that wouldn’t pass 85 code.

For example wiring in the basement goes across beams not along them. Also the general said the deck is too high and code will require a railing. These were all from the original owners (previous owners only here 3 years, and all they did was install a sump pump and french drains).
These things dont seem DANGEROUS so I dont want to pay to fix them. But I’m afraid they’ll find these and other things and it will be costly to fix everything. We already went way over our budget for repairs! The inspector we hired didn’t notice the plywood under all the sideing was rotted (due to original incorrect installation of tyvek / siding / gutters).

So legally, am I responsible for anything they find that hadn’t been done to code? I don’t understand why the building dept is acting irritated with me – I didn’t do anything, and I’m trying to now resolve the problem. It seems like it was their errors that got me into this mess.

In case things get expensive, is there any way the original owners are responsible for this? Or are we just stuck paying to fix anything they did wrong?

NOTE 1: Before anyone says "it’s your responsibility to ensure a house has an occupancy permit". How would we have done this? The bldg dept WAS asked if there were open permits and they said no.

NOTE 2: We did hire someone to inspect the property prior to purchase. They found many things, but not all. We realized there was a lot of damage to be repaired. We didn’t know the wiring wasn’t done to code or the deck was too high.

NOTE 3: There are no problems YET, but I want to be somewhat prepared and know what to do. This has already caused me to lost my mortgage rate lock, and delay our mortgage conversion. I’ll need to resolve this quickly to get the mortgage settled.

I realize there is risk when you buy a house. I thought we’d already paid for that with the new siding and fixing tons of rot.
But when other people actually violated the law, do we need to pay for that too?

Thanks for any information
We did do the inspection.

Legally the house required an occupancy permit for 25 years. The bldg dept was aware of this (from notices) but ignored it.
They were asked for open permits and incorrectly stated there were none.
Now I must legally do what original owner had to.
The question WAS asked (open permits) and bldg inspection office missed the info "in back of file".
Who else would we ask?
It is in writing (the "no open permits") only in the bank-assessors report. I could ask if they got it in writing, but I doubt it. Most likely a phone call.

And really – who do you know who has ever asked to get in writing "no open permits" prior to the purchase of a home.
Nothing was done "on the cheap". We’ve put 95k into the house already. We didn’t try to save money with a cheap inspection prior to purchase. The house was in need of repairs and wanted to TRY to know what we were getting into. Fully accepted responsibility for the missed rot, etc. An inspector is bound to miss something – and this required ripping off siding to discover.

But being responsible for others having broken the law, seems unfair.
We have every intention of obeying the law (unlike original owners who were state police officers).
Any violations will be fixed – I just fear the price of these. Our budget is already way over.

The house in question was initially bought by myself without any contribution by my partner. ( I.e I paid the deposit and the Mortgage and land registry are soley in my name). All the bills are in my name and are taken from my bank account. My partner moved in seven years ago and paid me initially £180 a month for 2 years and then £250 a month for then next 2 years and finally £400 a month for the last 3 years. All the home improvements to the house i.e conservatory, paved driveway etc i have paid for. Me and my partner are not married and haven’t any children. I would appreciate if somebody could advise me if we were to seperate is she entitled to a share of the house?